Kerabu: Why five goods still don't equal a great

In a nutshell...

Kerabu is a work in progress. So far there's a business plan, a blog and a draft of a book--all of which are about promoting a form of radical entrepreneurialism that is lucid, ecstatic and even sensual. (None too subtle, but that's why the blog is pretty and floaty--too many business blogs are IBM blue). My name is Hillary Johnson, and I'm the author of some books and a contributor to some other blogs (below), and sometimes write about business, entrepreneurialism and innovation for magazines like Inc.
CONTACT: kerabuinc (AT) gmail.com
Current Banner Image: Hedy Lamarr as Delilah Pure Land

Articles & Essays

If At First You Don't Succeed
Read my account of my father's history as a serial entrepreneur. Inc. Magazine
The Economy of Modernism
How architecture saved a rust belt town. Worth Magazine
The Next Management Revolution
Forget Sun Tsu, I use my encyclopedia of housekeeping as my management bible. Inc. Magazine
Why Dell Smoked Compaq
From the "Eye For Industry" column I wrote for US Business Review.

Books

Hillary Johnson: MTV's The Real Real World
New York Times Bestseller
Physical Culture
My obscure literary novel. I still like it. Given that I wrote it when I was 23, that's saying a lot.
Supervixens' Dymaxion Lounge
Essays about life in LA in the 90s. Now online.
The Calico Shaman
I've met two real shamans in my life, and my friend Carla is one of them. We had fun turning her work into fairytale-like stories.

Why five goods still don't equal a great

Brad Feld links to Tom Evslin's post about why a great programmer is worth fifty good ones:

I was consulting to a development manager at a tech company. He told me that the CEO, his boss, wouldn’t give him the salary and option freedom he needed to close a great programmer he’d found. Salary would have been 20% above what he had approval to offer; and, thanks to the new accounting standards for stock options, he didn’t have the authority to offer options. He lost the potential new hire and had to settle for someone merely “good”. Ironic thing is that he had several open positions so, once he gets through hiring several people, he’ll end up paying more in the aggregate than he would have paid for the superstar – and probably won’t get as much productivity.

Why do we persist in evaluating productivity as if the only model for productivity is the assembly line? Creative work is anything but incremental--it's in fact inherently exponential. If Einstein could accomplish a civilization's worth of "work" in a single calendar year (1905, while he was "working," incidentally, as a patent examiner), why don't we recognize that it's more efficient to value productivity on the content of the contribution alone?

Curiously, the only "jobs" now valued in this way are top-level executive positions, where the results are indeed measurable in company earnings, and where all measurements indicate that an investment in higher salaries has no positive effect.

Shouldn't it be the other way around? Let executives "earn" their salaries in the form of a profit share, but make capital investments in talent.

Powered by Qumana

May 04, 2006 in Work | Permalink

Comments

Yes, you're right. The notion of a *job* in many areas still carries the quaint holdover notion of a linear sequence of supervisable tasks, whilst in (increasingly) reality, the moment of real contribution can come in many places or at any time, based on what has gone before in an interonnected series of feedback loops, connections and relationships.

Ad yes, especially at the executive level, pay should be related almost only to performance, with a (much lower) base level of salary ... and should reflect real levels of current performance, not performance as voted onby a compensation committee staffed by cronies. Capital in the form of investment in salaries should be allocated to productive talent at lower levels.

Posted by: Jon Husband | May 04, 2006 at 04:43 PM

wyjazd sluzbowy

praca w biurze
umowa o zachowaniu poufnosci

Posted by: Staipinsask | November 12, 2011 at 12:11 AM

Hosting - to użyczanie przez dostawcę usługi internetowej zasobów serwerowni. Jeszcze precyzyjniej mówiąc polega to na "zajęciu" daniu do wykorzystania danej pojemności dysku twardego, na której wolno utrwalać pliki tworzące treść stron internetowych i albo udostępnienie przestrzeni dysku jak miejsca dla plików "leżących" w skrzynce mailowej. Inna odmiana hostingu to udzielenie większych rozmiarów dysku, a nawet pełnego serwera ewentualnie kilku - jako materialnego nośnika na rzecz dużego serwisu internetowego, portalu, grupy dyskusyjnej i innych. W każdej z nich chodzi o użyczenie fizycznego miejsca (dysku lub dysków twardych) dla umieszczenia rozmaitych form informacji dostępnych przez Net.Dużo usług hosting jest płatnych. Więc dlatego nie chcemy Cię kłamać. Nasze usługi hostingtakże są odpłatne, z jednym wyjątkiem, nasze usługi hosting są jednymi z najmniej kosztownych w globalnej siecie. Proponujemy hosting na najlepszym poziomie, po najniższejdopuszczalnej opłacie. Przekonaj się sam i wypróbuj naszą jakość! Inwitujemy na stronę internetową. Nasze usługi hostingtakże są płatne, z jedną tylko różnicą, nasze usługi hosting są jednymi z najmniej kosztownych w Internecie Nie jesteś w stanie w to dowierzyć, czy podważasz jeszcze słuszność tego, co tu jest wypisane? Jeżeli tak to już teraz zajrzyjwstąp na naszą stronę internetową i nabierz przekonania o przwdzie tego tekstu Nasze usługi hosting oferują najlepszą jakość w najniższej cenie. Nie będziesz musiał przeznaczać dużych sum za usługi hosting. Oferujemy wiele upustów i promocji wyjątkowo dla wiernych, ale i również dla świeżych odbiorcó. Zobacz sam i wejdź już teraz. Spostrzeżesz ile jesteś w stanie zaoszczędzićz nami.
Hosting

Posted by: Choorebra | December 06, 2011 at 12:50 AM

http://pracorada.pl/2011/12/wigilia-pracy/ - wigilia

http://pracorada.pl/2011/12/pomysl-na-biznes-jak-zalozyc-wlasna-firme/ - jak zalozyc wlasna firme

http://pracorada.pl/2011/11/urlop-macierzynski-urlop-ojcowski/ - urlop macierzynski

Posted by: issuekaddigma | December 13, 2011 at 12:17 AM