Here's the idea

  • Take a picture of your ass in the questionable pants and send it to:

    Please don't tell me who you are, this is anonymous. Comments will be moderated to weed out cretins and letches. Now for the fine print: no porn, no g-strings. Full-coverage pants only, please (or trousers if you're a Brit). Photos under 400 x 300 mp might not make it.


  • Because a) you can't see your own ass, and b) no one you know is going to tell you the truth.



« Wiggle Skirt | Main | How about those animal prints? »

January 06, 2006


Wanda Bodine

The problem, I think, with sweatpants is that they look good when you try them on in the store, but then they stretch out and become unflattering and baggy almost immediately. You need an ass that is high, proud and prominent to prevent unseemly drapeage--in short, only athletes should probably wear sweat pants.


Baggy. Not great.

Mary Mary

Attractive in a baggy sort of way. Great for the back yard, but not for public viewing.


Definitely not a fat ass, but you could fix that with some iron-on letters spanning the bum: "BLOGGED ASS" might not fit, though...

Amy Alkon

I find these sort of harem'y sexy watering-the-rose bushes attire. Of course, I think wearing of sweatpants in public should be banned. Voluntarily, of course. (Don't want to get Jackie or any other libertarians hyperventilating this early!)


while the pants are baggy, you still have a small ass


it doesn't look fat, but it also is unflattering. however, if you kept the sweatpants to the intendede home only lounging use, it's cool. everyone deswerves a pair of house pants that feel comfortable.

The comments to this entry are closed.