Here's the idea

  • Take a picture of your ass in the questionable pants and send it to:

    [email protected].

    Please don't tell me who you are, this is anonymous. Comments will be moderated to weed out cretins and letches. Now for the fine print: no porn, no g-strings. Full-coverage pants only, please (or trousers if you're a Brit). Photos under 400 x 300 mp might not make it.

Why?

  • Because a) you can't see your own ass, and b) no one you know is going to tell you the truth.

Assets

Etc.

« Good Genes in Good Jeans | Main | Does it? Does it? »

January 23, 2006

Comments

admin

I just don't buy the "comfort" argument men put forth as an excuse for this kind of thing. If Steve McQueen and Clint Eastwood could handle ass-hugging denim, why can't you boys?

leigh

hehe, yes, a little bit flat. need something more gripping. nice to see a man's heinie though.

Monica

Where IS your ass in these pants?

Amy Alkon

Maybe there's some trepidation about having their asses hugged?

hillary

Maybe if men were less obscurantist in their attire, they'd attract more female attention. Sometimes, for all the talk to the contrary, I wonder if they actually want that. Do they want us to want them?

stilettogirl

in these pants- you have NO ass at all

nancy

See, I like this look. The bagginess indicates to me that he doesn't really care about how his ass looks, but that he's ready to sprint if necessary. My kind of "dressed for action."

LLN

There's an ass in there? :)

Baker

maybe flat
But its hot

naf

nice tsitsit!

powermushroom

the jeans looks good
i'd rather not see a man's behind (total set off 4 me)
is that normal?:S

Mmm..

THAT'S HOT.
<3 your ass!

tenspeedsf

This is the denim equivalent of baggy sweats. It looks sloppy and I don't like it.

The comments to this entry are closed.